Posts Tagged ‘birthers’

Birthers, colonels & harvard law students

May 13, 2010

When I started this blog, my intention was never to spend my time writing about race issues. I figured that while race is still an issue, I should be able to avoid spending too much energy on it. The reality is that, unless you can read minds, you never really know what drives any particular behavior. There are always arguments that cast some doubt over the situation and leave you thinking that maybe, just maybe, this really isn’t about race after all. So I figured I’d just stay away from the whole race thing, and leave that kinda stuff to those people looking for work as civil rights activists. I just want it to go on record that I tried. Its just that some people make it really difficult.

Enter stage left, army doctor, Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, who is refusing to go on his second tour of duty because he has it in his head that the President was not born in the United States. This is not new. Ever since it became apparent that then Senator Obama could “win this thing” the nutcases started coming out of the woodwork (where apparently lots of nutcases reside). One such group of nutcases is the “birther” movement who hold the belief (or at least that’s what they say they believe) that President Obama was not born in the U.S. and so is not legally entitled to hold the office of President of the United States. This would be a huge deal if such claims were not debunked at every turn. His Hawaiian birth certificate was presented and verified, and media investigators along with Hawaiian officials have gone on record defending the validity of the document. The birthers, however, refuse to accept this and insist that the President provide additional proof. Maybe what they’re really trying to say is that Hawaii isn’t really part of the United States.

They have succeeded in infiltrating the ranks of the nation’s military and are apparently intent on undermining the very security of the country they claim to love. They have enlisted the good Lt. Col. Lakin, who, thus far has succeeded only in sullying his own reputation (sounds better than ‘looking like an idiot’ which he does really well by the way). I’m guessing that he thinks he looks all principled and stuff, but to me, when he shows up on national television, with his birther financed lawyer,words like petulant and racist, come more easily to mind. Racist is not an adjective I use lightly,and I sincerely hope that is not his motivation, but I am unable to see any other force behind this movement and behind people like, soon to be ‘Mr.’ Lakin.

He claims (or rather he mouths claims made by the birthers) that there is “mounting and significant evidence” against the validity of the President’s birth certificate. If he were really genuine in his intentions, then he would come forward with this ‘evidence’ and not leave us all in suspense. As for his lawyer, he brings to mind (to my mind anyway) that character in O Brother, Where Art Thou, who takes part in ‘venerated obzoivances’. Not the best choice Colonel.

As if this wasn’t enough, enter Ms. Stephanie Grace, Harvard Law Student, who catapults herself into the national limelight…..via email. In an email she, in her infinite wisdom, and with “grace” overflowing, declares, ‘ I absolutely do not rule out the possibility that African-Americans are, on average, genetically predisposed to be less intelligent’. I’m thinking I should not feel personally insulted, because obviously Ms. Grace, from within the bowels (yeah, bowels because you know what comes out of bowels) of her lily-white intelligence is fully aware that African-American is a cultural construct, and is not a synonym for Black. As such I have to assume that this genetic defect is peculiar to Black people who are born in the United States.

Let us suppose for a moment that she did mean all Black people. Since ‘racists don’t discriminate’ I believe this is much closer to the truth. Ms. Grace feels that the accident of nature that made her white, also made her more intelligent than Black people. I say Black people, because her email singles us out. It does not give any insight into how she feels about people of other races, so for now, we can’t quite call her a white supremacist…….not quite.

Ms. Grace later apologized and is apparently ‘heartbroken and devastated’ because she did not mean to cause any harm. Are you kidding me? At this point, if I am to follow her own logic, I have no choice but to believe that she herself must be African-American, because only someone ‘less intelligent’ could possibly believe that they could get caught saying something that stupidly insensitive and not expect any fallout. Perhaps she feels a change in the wind and thinks it has suddenly become ok to resurrect ghosts of a racist past. Well at least we know where she stands, which is more than we can say for the others out there.

The scary part here is that Ms. Grace is on her way to becoming a lawyer. Now I have no idea what kind of law she is intending to practice, but I am convinced that, no matter what, it spells trouble for any Black people who come within her sphere of influence, be they colleagues or clients. Black colleagues will know that she is merely tolerating them as one suffers fools, and Black clients cannot expect any fairness or objectivity in her dealings with them. Ms. Grace has unwittingly put a face on the systemic racism that exists today. Heaven help us if she becomes a judge.

Mr. Lakin is portraying himself as principled. I must assume then that based on principle, he has either refused his army salary for the past year and change, or is at least making arrangements to return any funds and benefits received over the past year and a half while the President has been in office. I mean, it’s the principle of the thing…….right? As for Ms. Grace, she is tryig her best to affect the role of the disconnected scientific observer, with all her calls for scientific data and such. Again, based on her own logic, it seems to me that her scientific objectivity is being called into question, since nowhere does she call for ‘scientfic data’ to prove that white people are ‘more intelligent’.  Come on Gracie, if you’re going to be objective about a thing, you need to do it right.


%d bloggers like this: